A survey to evaluate parental consent as public policy for neonatal screening.

R. Faden, A. J. Chwalow, N. A. Holtzman, S. D. Horn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

53 Scopus citations


Most states currently have laws which result in compulsory neonatal screening practices, despite a widespread consensus that participation in genetic services and programs should be voluntary. In 1976, Maryland adopted a regulation designed to respect parents' rights to refuse neonatal screening by imposing a parental consent requirement. The results of a study designed to evaluate the effects of this regulation are reviewed here. Many health care providers were unaware of the parental consent regulation. However, hospitals were generally in compliance with the technical stipulations of the regulations. There was little evidence that the regulation resulted in additional costs to the health care system, either in terms of hospital staff time or in terms of loss of efficiency in the number of infants screened. Mothers affected by the regulation were largely in favor of being informed about neonatal screening and learned a significant amount of new information from the disclosure process. They were almost evenly divided on whether they favored parental consent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1347-1352
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican journal of public health
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1982

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health


Dive into the research topics of 'A survey to evaluate parental consent as public policy for neonatal screening.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this