TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of state regulations for child care
T2 - Preventing, recognizing and reporting child maltreatment
AU - Grossman, Elyse R.
AU - McClendon, Jasmine E.
AU - Gielen, Andrea C.
AU - McDonald, Eileen M.
AU - Benjamin-Neelon, Sara E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported, in part, by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), Healthy Eating Research #73391, and, in part, by the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Injury Control Research Center (#1R49CE002466). The funders had no role in the design of the study, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Background: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly 60% of children under 5 years of age were cared for in out-of-home child care arrangements in the United States. Thus, child care provides an opportunity to identify and address potential child maltreatment. However, during the pandemic, rates of reporting child maltreatment decreased—likely because children spent less time in the presence of mandated reporters. As children return to child care, states must have regulations in place to help child care providers prevent, recognize and report child maltreatment. However, little is known about the extent to which state regulations address child maltreatment. Therefore, the purpose of this cross-sectional study was to assess state regulations related to child maltreatment and compare them to national standards. Method: We reviewed state regulations for all 50 states and the District of Columbia for child care centres (‘centres’) and family child care homes (‘homes’) through 31 July 2021 and compared these regulations to eight national health and safety standards on child maltreatment. We coded regulations as either not meeting, partially meeting or fully meeting each standard. Results: Three states (Colorado, Utah and Washington) had regulations for centres, and one state (Washington) had regulations for homes that at least partially met all eight national standards. Nearly all states had regulations consistent with the standards requiring that caregivers and teachers are mandated reporters of child maltreatment and requiring that they be trained in preventing, recognizing and reporting child maltreatment. One state (Hawaii) did not have regulations consistent with any of the national standards for either centres or homes. Conclusions: Generally, states lacked regulations related to the prevention, recognition and reporting of child maltreatment for both centres and homes. Encouraging states to adopt regulations that meet national standards and further exploring their impact on child welfare are important next steps.
AB - Background: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly 60% of children under 5 years of age were cared for in out-of-home child care arrangements in the United States. Thus, child care provides an opportunity to identify and address potential child maltreatment. However, during the pandemic, rates of reporting child maltreatment decreased—likely because children spent less time in the presence of mandated reporters. As children return to child care, states must have regulations in place to help child care providers prevent, recognize and report child maltreatment. However, little is known about the extent to which state regulations address child maltreatment. Therefore, the purpose of this cross-sectional study was to assess state regulations related to child maltreatment and compare them to national standards. Method: We reviewed state regulations for all 50 states and the District of Columbia for child care centres (‘centres’) and family child care homes (‘homes’) through 31 July 2021 and compared these regulations to eight national health and safety standards on child maltreatment. We coded regulations as either not meeting, partially meeting or fully meeting each standard. Results: Three states (Colorado, Utah and Washington) had regulations for centres, and one state (Washington) had regulations for homes that at least partially met all eight national standards. Nearly all states had regulations consistent with the standards requiring that caregivers and teachers are mandated reporters of child maltreatment and requiring that they be trained in preventing, recognizing and reporting child maltreatment. One state (Hawaii) did not have regulations consistent with any of the national standards for either centres or homes. Conclusions: Generally, states lacked regulations related to the prevention, recognition and reporting of child maltreatment for both centres and homes. Encouraging states to adopt regulations that meet national standards and further exploring their impact on child welfare are important next steps.
KW - child care
KW - child maltreatment
KW - mandatory reporting
KW - state regulations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143235370&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85143235370&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/cch.13080
DO - 10.1111/cch.13080
M3 - Article
C2 - 36377347
AN - SCOPUS:85143235370
SN - 0305-1862
VL - 49
SP - 657
EP - 668
JO - Child: Care, Health and Development
JF - Child: Care, Health and Development
IS - 4
ER -