TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire
AU - Whiteman, Maura K.
AU - Langenberg, Patricia
AU - Kjerulff, Kristen
AU - McCarter, Robert
AU - Flaws, Jodi Anne
PY - 2003/10
Y1 - 2003/10
N2 - Background: Mailed questionnaires can be a convenient method for collecting data on women's health, although poor response rates are a concern. Methods: As part of a survey of women's health conducted in Maryland in 2001, a randomized trial was performed to assess the effects of two incentives ($1.00 or a lottery ticket) as well as precontact with an introductory postcard on response rates. Questionnaires were mailed to 3000 women aged 40-60 who were randomized to one of six incentive/precontact groups: lottery/postcard, money/postcard, postcard only, lottery only, money only, or no incentive/no postcard. Results: The overall response rate was 37.6%. Each incentive/precontact group yielded a higher response rate than the no incentive/no postcard group, although only the response rates for the lottery/postcard group (41.3%) and the money only group (40.0%) were significantly higher than that of the no incentive/no postcard group (33.1%). Money was the only factor that had a significant independent effect on likelihood of response (hazards ratio [HR] compared to no incentive = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03, 1.43). Response rates were lower in minority ZIP codes, although the effects of the incentives were generally greater than in the nonminority ZIP codes. Conclusions: These results indicate that response rates to mailed women's health questionnaires may be improved with modest incentives, particularly cash incentives.
AB - Background: Mailed questionnaires can be a convenient method for collecting data on women's health, although poor response rates are a concern. Methods: As part of a survey of women's health conducted in Maryland in 2001, a randomized trial was performed to assess the effects of two incentives ($1.00 or a lottery ticket) as well as precontact with an introductory postcard on response rates. Questionnaires were mailed to 3000 women aged 40-60 who were randomized to one of six incentive/precontact groups: lottery/postcard, money/postcard, postcard only, lottery only, money only, or no incentive/no postcard. Results: The overall response rate was 37.6%. Each incentive/precontact group yielded a higher response rate than the no incentive/no postcard group, although only the response rates for the lottery/postcard group (41.3%) and the money only group (40.0%) were significantly higher than that of the no incentive/no postcard group (33.1%). Money was the only factor that had a significant independent effect on likelihood of response (hazards ratio [HR] compared to no incentive = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03, 1.43). Response rates were lower in minority ZIP codes, although the effects of the incentives were generally greater than in the nonminority ZIP codes. Conclusions: These results indicate that response rates to mailed women's health questionnaires may be improved with modest incentives, particularly cash incentives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242362795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242362795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 14588132
AN - SCOPUS:0242362795
SN - 1540-9996
VL - 12
SP - 821
EP - 828
JO - Journal of Women's Health
JF - Journal of Women's Health
IS - 8
ER -