Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A randomized phase II study of cediranib alone versus cediranib in combination with dasatinib in docetaxel resistant, castration resistant prostate cancer patients

  • Anna Spreafico
  • , Kim N. Chi
  • , Srikala S. Sridhar
  • , David C. Smith
  • , Michael A. Carducci
  • , Peter Kavsak
  • , Tracy S. Wong
  • , Lisa Wang
  • , S. Percy Ivy
  • , Som Dave Mukherjee
  • , Christian K. Kollmannsberger
  • , Mahadeo A. Sukhai
  • , Naoko Takebe
  • , Suzanne Kamel-Reid
  • , Lillian L. Siu
  • , Sebastien J. Hotte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Activation of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and the oncogenic Src pathway has been implicated in the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in preclinical models. Cediranib and dasatinib are multi-kinase inhibitors targeting VEGFR and Src respectively. Phase II studies of cediranib and dasatinib in CRPC have shown single agent activity. Methods: Docetaxel-pretreated CRPC patients were randomized to arm A: cediranib alone (20 mg/day) versus arm B: cediranib (20 mg/day) plus dasatinib (100 mg/day) given orally on 4-week cycles. Primary endpoint was 12-week progression-free survival (PFS) as per the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2). Patient reported outcomes were evaluated using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Present Pain Intensity (PPI) scales. Correlative studies of bone turnover markers (BTM), including bone alkaline phosphate (BAP) and serum beta-C telopeptide (B-CTx) were serially assayed. Results: A total of 22 patients, 11 per arm, were enrolled. Baseline demographics were similar in both arms. Median number of cycles =4 in arm A (range 1-12) and 2 in arm B (range 1-9). Twelve-week PFS was 73 % in arm A versus 18 % in arm B (p=0.03). Median PFS inmonths (arm A versus B) was: 5.2 versus 2.6 (95 % CI: 1.9-6.5 versus 1.4-not reached). Most common grade 3 toxicities were hypertension, anemia and thrombocytopenia in arm A and hypertension, diarrhea and fatigue in arm B. One treatment-related death (retroperitoneal hemorrhage) was seen in arm A. FACT-P and PPI scores did not significantly change in either arm. No correlation between BTM and PFS was seen in either arm. Conclusions: Although limited by small numbers, this randomized study showed that the combination of VEGFR and Src targeted therapy did not result in improved efficacy and may be associated with a worse outcome than VEGFR targeted therapy alone in patients with CRPC. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01260688.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1005-1016
Number of pages12
JournalInvestigational New Drugs
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2014

Keywords

  • Bone turnover marker
  • Castration resistant prostate cancer
  • Cediranib
  • Dasatinib
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized phase II study of cediranib alone versus cediranib in combination with dasatinib in docetaxel resistant, castration resistant prostate cancer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this