A prospective evaluation of 2 different pain management protocols for total hip arthroplasty

Zachary D. Post, Camilo Restrepo, Lauren K. Kahl, Tim van de Leur, James J. Purtill, William J. Hozack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Pain management after total hip arthroplasty has improved dramatically in the past decade. However, most protocols use opioid medications for pain control. In the current study, 100 patients were prospectively selected to receive a traditional narcotic-based patient-controlled analgesia protocol or a nonnarcotic oral protocol for pain management after primary total hip arthroplasty. Therapy programs were similar for both groups. Postoperatively, patients were followed daily for opioid use, medication adverse effects, pain control, and overall satisfaction. The nonnarcotic oral group showed lower mean pain scores during the first 24 hours after surgery. The satisfaction rate was high in both groups. Both protocols provided adequate pain control after total hip arthroplasty; the nonnarcotic pain management protocol resulted in significantly decreased opioid consumption and fewer adverse effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)410-415
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adverse effects
  • Narcotic consumption
  • Pain management
  • Satisfaction
  • Total hip arthroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A prospective evaluation of 2 different pain management protocols for total hip arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this