A patient and community-centered approach selecting endpoints for a randomized trial of a novel advance care planning tool

John F.P. Bridges, Norah L. Crossnohere, Anne L. Schuster, Judith A. Miller, Carolyn Pastorini, Rebecca A. Aslakson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Background: Despite a movement toward patient-centered outcomes, best practices on how to gather and refine patients’ perspectives on research endpoints are limited. Advanced care planning (ACP) is inherently patient centered and would benefit from patient prioritization of endpoints for ACP-related tools and studies. Objective: This investigation sought to prioritize patient-centered endpoints for the content and evaluation of an ACP video being developed for patients undergoing major surgery. We also sought to highlight an approach using complementary engagement and research strategies to document priorities and preferences of patients and other stakeholders. Materials and methods: Endpoints identified from a previously published environmental scan were operationalized following rating by a caregiver co-investigator, refinement by a patient co-investigator, review by a stakeholder committee, and validation by patients and family members. Finalized endpoints were taken to a state fair where members of the public who indicated that they or a loved one had undergone major surgery prioritized their most relevant endpoints and provided comments. Results: Of the initial 50 ACP endpoints identified from the review, 12 endpoints were selected for public prioritization. At the state fair, 359 individuals prioritized the endpoints, the highest ranking of which was having a meaningful conversation with a physician before surgery (57%). Conclusion: Using a novel combination of engagement and research techniques provided the opportunity to understand which endpoints were most important to patients and families and fostered framework development clarifying the differential contributions of engagement and research. Results from this study ultimately changed the content and evaluation of the ACP video.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-249
Number of pages9
JournalPatient Preference and Adherence
StatePublished - Feb 8 2018
Externally publishedYes


  • Community participation
  • Patient participation
  • Patient preference
  • Research design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy


Dive into the research topics of 'A patient and community-centered approach selecting endpoints for a randomized trial of a novel advance care planning tool'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this