TY - JOUR
T1 - A nationwide analysis of the use and outcomes of perioperative epidural analgesia in patients undergoing hepatic and pancreatic surgery
AU - Amini, Neda
AU - Kim, Yuhree
AU - Hyder, Omar
AU - Spolverato, Gaya
AU - Wu, Christopher L.
AU - Page, Andrew J.
AU - Pawlik, Timothy M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background We sought to define trends in the use of epidural analgesia (EA) for hepatopancreatic procedures, as well as to characterize inpatient outcomes relative to the use of EA. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried to identify all elective hepatopancreatic surgeries between 2000 and 2012. In-hospital outcomes were compared among patients receiving EA vs conventional analgesia using propensity matching. Results EA utilization was 7.4% (n = 3,961). The use of EA among minimally invasive procedures increased from 3.8% in 2000 to 9.1% in 2012. The odds of sepsis (odds ratio [OR].72, 95% confidence interval [CI].56 to.93), respiratory failure (OR.79, 95% CI.69 to.91), and postoperative pneumonia (OR.77, 95% CI.61 to.98), as well as overall in-hospital mortality (OR.72, 95% CI.56 to.93) were lower in the EA cohort (all P <.05). In contrast, no association was noted between EA and postoperative hemorrhage (OR.81, 95% CI.65 to 1.01, P =.06). Conclusions EA use among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic procedures remains low. After controlling for confounding factors, EA remained associated with a reduction in specific pulmonary-related complications, as well as in-hospital mortality.
AB - Background We sought to define trends in the use of epidural analgesia (EA) for hepatopancreatic procedures, as well as to characterize inpatient outcomes relative to the use of EA. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried to identify all elective hepatopancreatic surgeries between 2000 and 2012. In-hospital outcomes were compared among patients receiving EA vs conventional analgesia using propensity matching. Results EA utilization was 7.4% (n = 3,961). The use of EA among minimally invasive procedures increased from 3.8% in 2000 to 9.1% in 2012. The odds of sepsis (odds ratio [OR].72, 95% confidence interval [CI].56 to.93), respiratory failure (OR.79, 95% CI.69 to.91), and postoperative pneumonia (OR.77, 95% CI.61 to.98), as well as overall in-hospital mortality (OR.72, 95% CI.56 to.93) were lower in the EA cohort (all P <.05). In contrast, no association was noted between EA and postoperative hemorrhage (OR.81, 95% CI.65 to 1.01, P =.06). Conclusions EA use among patients undergoing hepatopancreatic procedures remains low. After controlling for confounding factors, EA remained associated with a reduction in specific pulmonary-related complications, as well as in-hospital mortality.
KW - Epidural analgesia
KW - Liver resection
KW - Outcome
KW - Pancreatic resection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945990285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945990285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.009
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 26105799
AN - SCOPUS:84945990285
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 210
SP - 483
EP - 491
JO - American journal of surgery
JF - American journal of surgery
IS - 3
ER -