A national study of alcohol consumption patterns among population-based U.S. cancer survivors compared with cancer-free individuals

Junrui Lyu, Maneet Kaur, Kate E. Dibble, Avonne E. Connor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: This study characterized alcohol consumption behaviors among adult cancer survivors and determined how these behaviors compared with cancer-free individuals using NHANES data (1999–2016). Methods: Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multinomial logistic regression for the association between cancer survivors vs cancer-free individuals and odds of drinking status (former/current/never drinkers), accounting for demographic and socioeconomic factors. Among current drinkers, multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate the aORs for binge drinking and exceeding moderate drinking. Results: A total of 3113 survivors and 39,527 cancer-free individuals were included. Cancer survivors were less likely to be current drinkers (63.4% vs. 72.6% in cancer-free) and were more likely to be former drinkers (24.4% vs. 15.5% in cancer-free). Cancer survivors had significant lower odds of being current vs. never drinkers (aOR, 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71–0.99). By cancer types, cervical cancer survivors were more likely to be binge drinkers (aOR, 2.51, 95% CI: 1.27–4.92), particularly among women aged ≥ 55 years (aOR, 6.90, 95% CI: 1.28–37.3). Conclusion: Given the high odds of binge drinking among cervical cancer survivors, public health strategies are needed to reduce alcohol consumption in this group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number102101
JournalCancer Epidemiology
Volume77
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • Binge drinking
  • Cancer survivorship
  • Lifestyle factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A national study of alcohol consumption patterns among population-based U.S. cancer survivors compared with cancer-free individuals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this