TY - JOUR
T1 - A Cross-Sectional Survey on Oral Nicotine Pouches
T2 - Characterizing Use-Motives, Topography, Dependence Levels, and Adverse Events
AU - Dowd, Ashley N.
AU - Thrul, Johannes
AU - Czaplicki, Lauren
AU - Kennedy, Ryan D.
AU - Moran, Meghan B.
AU - Spindle, Tory R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - Introduction: Oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) contain a crystalized nicotine powder instead of tobacco leaves. ONPs come in a variety of flavors and are often marketed as “tobacco-free,” but research on ONP use-motivations and related experiences is limited. Aims and Methods: This cross-sectional web-based survey collected self-report data on ONP use-characteristics (eg, frequency), brands and flavors used, use-motivations, dependence (FagerströmTest for Nicotine Dependence-SmokelessTobacco [FTND-ST]), and ONP-related adverse events (AEs) experienced. Results: The sample included 118 adults who reported current (past 30-day) ONP use. On average (SD), participants reported ONP use on 13 (6) days during the past month. Most participants (% of the sample) also reported the use of tobacco cigarettes (74%) and/or electronic cigarettes (53%) during the past month. Zyn (27%) and Lucy (19%) were the most currently used ONP brands with mint (23%) and tobacco (16%) as the most currently used flavors. The availability of preferred flavors was the most frequently reported (31%) ONP use-motivation. The sample demonstrated significant dependence levels (FTND-ST = 7, SD = 2). Reported AEs included mouth lesions (48%), upset stomach (39%), sore mouth (37%), sore throat (21%), and nausea (9%). Results should be interpreted in the context of study limitations, including using a relatively small and homogeneous online convenience sample. Acknowledging the limitations, this sample was deemed appropriate to include considering the novelty of the findings, the dearth of related research, and the necessity of examining foundational ONP use-characteristics (eg, topography, AEs); however, future research should consider recruiting larger and more generalizable samples. Conclusions: The availability of preferred flavors was a key ONP use-motivation in this sample. Mint and tobacco were the most currently used flavors, with Zyn and Lucy being the most currently used ONP brands. Participants reported dependence and a substantial number of ONP-related AEs. Nationally representative surveys should investigate ONP use along with outcomes included in the current study (eg, AEs) to inform ONP surveillance and policy development efforts.
AB - Introduction: Oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) contain a crystalized nicotine powder instead of tobacco leaves. ONPs come in a variety of flavors and are often marketed as “tobacco-free,” but research on ONP use-motivations and related experiences is limited. Aims and Methods: This cross-sectional web-based survey collected self-report data on ONP use-characteristics (eg, frequency), brands and flavors used, use-motivations, dependence (FagerströmTest for Nicotine Dependence-SmokelessTobacco [FTND-ST]), and ONP-related adverse events (AEs) experienced. Results: The sample included 118 adults who reported current (past 30-day) ONP use. On average (SD), participants reported ONP use on 13 (6) days during the past month. Most participants (% of the sample) also reported the use of tobacco cigarettes (74%) and/or electronic cigarettes (53%) during the past month. Zyn (27%) and Lucy (19%) were the most currently used ONP brands with mint (23%) and tobacco (16%) as the most currently used flavors. The availability of preferred flavors was the most frequently reported (31%) ONP use-motivation. The sample demonstrated significant dependence levels (FTND-ST = 7, SD = 2). Reported AEs included mouth lesions (48%), upset stomach (39%), sore mouth (37%), sore throat (21%), and nausea (9%). Results should be interpreted in the context of study limitations, including using a relatively small and homogeneous online convenience sample. Acknowledging the limitations, this sample was deemed appropriate to include considering the novelty of the findings, the dearth of related research, and the necessity of examining foundational ONP use-characteristics (eg, topography, AEs); however, future research should consider recruiting larger and more generalizable samples. Conclusions: The availability of preferred flavors was a key ONP use-motivation in this sample. Mint and tobacco were the most currently used flavors, with Zyn and Lucy being the most currently used ONP brands. Participants reported dependence and a substantial number of ONP-related AEs. Nationally representative surveys should investigate ONP use along with outcomes included in the current study (eg, AEs) to inform ONP surveillance and policy development efforts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183312304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85183312304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ntr/ntad179
DO - 10.1093/ntr/ntad179
M3 - Article
C2 - 37712111
AN - SCOPUS:85183312304
SN - 1462-2203
VL - 26
SP - 245
EP - 249
JO - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
JF - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
IS - 2
ER -