A correlative biomarker study and integrative prognostic model in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide

María P. Fernandez-Perez, Enrique Perez-Navarro, Teresa Alonso-Gordoa, Vicenza Conteduca, Albert Font, Sergio Vázquez-Estévez, Aránzazu González-del-Alba, Daniel Wetterskog, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Begona Mellado, Ovidio Fernandez-Calvo, María J. Méndez-Vidal, Miguel A. Climent, Ignacio Duran, Enrique Gallardo, Angel Rodriguez Sanchez, Carmen Santander, Maria I. Sáez, Javier Puente, Julian TudelaAlberto Martínez, Maria J. López-Andreo, José Padilla, Rebeca Lozano, David Hervas, Jun Luo, Ugo de Giorgi, Daniel Castellano, Gerhardt Attard, Enrique Grande, Enrique Gonzalez-Billalabeitia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: There is a considerable need to incorporate biomarkers of resistance to new antiandrogen agents in the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods: We conducted a phase II trial of enzalutamide in first-line chemo-naïve asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC and analyzed the prognostic value of TMPRSS2-ERG and other biomarkers, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), androgen receptor splice variant (AR-V7) in CTCs and plasma Androgen Receptor copy number gain (AR-gain). These biomarkers were correlated with treatment response and survival outcomes and developed a clinical–molecular prognostic model using penalized cox-proportional hazard model. This model was validated in an independent cohort. Results: Ninety-eight patients were included. TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene was detected in 32 patients with no differences observed in efficacy outcomes. CTC detection was associated with worse outcome and AR-V7 in CTCs was associated with increased rate of progression as best response. Plasma AR gain was strongly associated with an adverse outcome, with worse median prostate specific antigen (PSA)-PFS (4.2 vs. 14.7 m; p < 0.0001), rad-PFS (4.5 vs. 27.6 m; p < 0.0001), and OS (12.7 vs. 38.1 m; p < 0.0001). The clinical prognostic model developed in PREVAIL was validated (C-Index 0.70) and the addition of plasma AR (C-Index 0.79; p < 0.001) increased its prognostic ability. We generated a parsimonious model including alkaline phosphatase (ALP); PSA and AR gain (C-index 0.78) that was validated in an independent cohort. Conclusions: TMPRSS2-ERG detection did not correlate with differential activity of enzalutamide in first-line mCRPC. However, we observed that CTCs and plasma AR gain were the most relevant biomarkers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)376-384
Number of pages9
JournalProstate
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Keywords

  • AR gain
  • AR-V7
  • CTCs
  • TMPRSS2-ERG
  • enzalutamide
  • prostate cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A correlative biomarker study and integrative prognostic model in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this