A Comparison of In-Person and Telehealth Personalized Exercise Programs for Cancer Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis

Background/Objectives: This study evaluates the effects of a personalized exercise program on symptoms (pain, fatigue, sleep, cognitive function, physical function), resilience, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and compares the effectiveness of in-person versus telehealth delivery. Methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted on two 12-week randomized control pilot studies for solid tumor cancer survivors. One study involved in-person home visits with telephone follow-ups. The second utilized weekly exercise recommendations via a smartphone app. Both studies had control participants who received the standard care. Symptoms, resilience, and HRQOL were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. Paired t-tests were conducted for intervention effects and ANCOVA for group differences, adjusting for age and education. Results: The analysis included 75 program completers: 15 in-person (iHBE), 38 telehealth (TEHE), and 22 who received standard care. Those receiving exercise interventions reported improvements in physical (t = 3.0, p < 0.01) and mental fatigability (t = 3.1, p < 0.01) at program completion compared to baseline. Comparing the mean changes between participants receiving exercise interventions in-person and via telehealth, there were no significant differences between the two delivery methods except perceived visuo-perceptual cognitive difficulty (F = 3.55, p = 0.027), where telehealth showed a slight advantage. Conclusions: The study provides initial evidence of the effectiveness of a telehealth personalized exercise on fatigability and cognitive difficulty, suggesting it is a potential viable alternative to in-person intervention. Further research with a larger cohort is essential to ascertain the effects of these interventional modalities on cancer-related health outcomes.