A Closer Examination of the Patient Experience in the Ambulatory Space: A Retrospective Qualitative Comparison of Primary Care with Specialty Care Experiences

Zahi R. Jurdi, Joseph F. Crosby, James E. Harris, Jillian B. Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This qualitative study explores key patient experience impressions responsible for driving quality. Differences between primary and specialty care patient perspectives were analyzed using a mixed-methods design in high-, median-, and low-quality performing practices. We found that primary care patients highly value provider listening, time spent with provider, and consistent and effective coordination of care. Specialty care patients were found to highly value provider clinical skill acumen/outcomes, being kept informed with timely updates and care instructions, and a stress- A nd pain-free experience. We conclude that differing patient types attach greater value to different elements of their health care experiences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-97
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Ambulatory Care Management
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Keywords

  • ambulatory
  • mixed methods
  • patient experience
  • primary care
  • qualitative
  • specialty care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Closer Examination of the Patient Experience in the Ambulatory Space: A Retrospective Qualitative Comparison of Primary Care with Specialty Care Experiences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this