Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

6. Persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2

  • Johan van de Minkelis
  • , Laurens Peene
  • , Steven P. Cohen
  • , Peter Staats
  • , Adnan Al-Kaisy
  • , Koen Van Boxem
  • , Jan Willem Kallewaard
  • , Jan Van Zundert

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS) refers to chronic axial pain and/or extremity pain. Two subtypes have been defined: PSPS-type 1 is chronic pain without previous spinal surgery and PSPS-type 2 is chronic pain, persisting after spine surgery, and is formerly known as Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) or post-laminectomy syndrome. The etiology of PSPS-type 2 can be gleaned using elements from the patient history, physical examination, and additional medical imaging. Origins of persistent pain following spinal surgery may be categorized into an inappropriate procedure (eg a lumbar fusion at an incorrect level or for sacroiliac joint [SIJ] pain); technical failure (eg operation at non-affected levels, retained disk fragment, pseudoarthrosis), biomechanical sequelae of surgery (eg adjacent segment disease or SIJ pain after a fusion to the sacrum, muscle wasting, spinal instability); and complications (eg battered root syndrome, excessive epidural fibrosis, and arachnoiditis), or undetermined. Methods: The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of PSPS-type 2 was retrieved and summarized. Results: There is low-quality evidence for the efficacy of conservative treatments including exercise, rehabilitation, manipulation, and behavioral therapy, and very limited evidence for the pharmacological treatment of PSPS-type 2. Interventional treatments such as pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the dorsal root ganglia, epidural adhesiolysis, and spinal endoscopy (epiduroscopy) might be beneficial in patients with PSPS-type 2. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for chronic, intractable neuropathic limb pain, and possibly well-selected candidates with axial pain. Conclusions: The diagnosis of PSPS-type 2 is based on patient history, clinical examination, and medical imaging. Low-quality evidence exists for conservative interventions. Pulsed radiofrequency, adhesiolysis and SCS have a higher level of evidence with a high safety margin and should be considered as interventional treatment options when conservative treatment fails.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)919-936
Number of pages18
JournalPain Practice
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • back pain
  • evidence-based medic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '6. Persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this